Monday, December 30, 2019
How Adequate Is Millââ¬â¢s Conception of Happiness How Good...
How adequate is Millââ¬â¢s conception of happiness? How good are his arguments to show that ââ¬Å"higherâ⬠pleasures are intrinsically more desirable than ââ¬Å"lowerâ⬠ones? Is this distinction consistent with the thesis that pleasure is the only thing of value? In ââ¬Å"Utilitarianismâ⬠Mill argues that ââ¬Ëhigherââ¬â¢ pleasures are intrinsically more valuable than ââ¬Ëlowerââ¬â¢ pleasures, citing the invariable preference of men who have access to both available (pp.140). I am inclined to disagree, particularly with regards to his assertion that ââ¬Ëhigherââ¬â¢ pleasures have such a ââ¬Å"superiority of qualityâ⬠(pp.139), so as to render any quantity of ââ¬Ëlowerââ¬â¢ pleasures ââ¬Å"in comparison, of small accountâ⬠- this non-cardinal view of pleasure raises many discontinuities. This isâ⬠¦show more contentâ⬠¦In Millââ¬â¢s favour is the seemingly fundamental difference between human and animal pleasures, and ââ¬Ëhigherââ¬â¢ and ââ¬Ëlowerââ¬â¢ pleasures as an extension of this. He draws our attention to this with his assertion that we would prefer to be a ââ¬Å"human being unsatisfied than a pig satisfiedâ⬠(pp.140). This seems similar to earlier comparisons, but there is an important distinction. Mill highlights that anyone who doesnââ¬â¢t believe there are intrinsically more desirable higher pleasures is forced to concede it would be better to live as a beast. ââ¬ËHigherââ¬â¢ pleasures are an embodiment of our higher faculties and I believe that our enjoyment of these is an important marker of what makes us human. Which animal enjoys solving mathematics? Thus, as far as the distinction between human and animal pleasures, Millââ¬â¢s claim seems reasonable. Another strength of Millââ¬â¢s argument is his choice of words surrounding the ââ¬Ëlowerââ¬â¢ pleasures. We are told of a ââ¬Å"satisfiedâ⬠pig, and a ââ¬Å"contentâ⬠fool (pp.139-140). These sound like oxymoron, but also remind us of the much higher capacity for enjoyment of more intelligent people. A fool is easily contented, for he can easily exhaust the pleasure sources available to him. For the intelligent man or woman, the myriad of options available to them ensures they can never be lazily ââ¬Å"contentâ⬠. In addition, Millââ¬â¢s views surrounding the ââ¬Ëhigherââ¬â¢ pleasures cannot beShow MoreRelatedOrganisational Theory230255 Words à |à 922 Pages. Organization Theory Challenges and Perspectives John McAuley, Joanne Duberley and Phil Johnson . This book is, to my knowledge, the most comprehensive and reliable guide to organisational theory currently available. What is needed is a text that will give a good idea of the breadth and complexity of this important subject, and this is precisely what McAuley, Duberley and Johnson have provided. They have done some sterling service in bringing together the very diverse strands of work
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.